Daniel Rogov (1935-2011)

Daniel Rogov (whose real name was David Joroff), passed away this past Wednesday (September 7th) in Israel after being ill for some time. In addition to the tribute to him I published last week, I intend to post a personal eulogy in this space within the next few days. Until that time, I have collected a number of eulogies, both in English and Hebrew, which are linked to below which includes his own farewell letter posted on his wine forum (the pages of comments are well worth reading as well). Two of the ones I felt hit closest to home were the English eulogies by Gamliel Kronemer in the Jewish Week and Caroline Glick in the Jerusalem Post and the Hebrew one written by Aeyal Gross.

For those of you who never had the pleasure of meeting Rogov (as he preferred to be known), I have also included links to a number of video clips that will help you gain a sense of him as a person, in addition to the fabulous writer he was.

Eulogies

English

Rogov’s Farewell

Yossie’s Corkboard

Jerusalem Post

Adam Montefiore

Haaretz

Gamliel Kronemer (Jewish Week)

Zipi Shohat

Anshel Pfeffer

Chaim Shraga

The Jew & the Carrot

Decanter

Wines-Israel.com

Wine Enthusiast

David Raccah

JTA

Hebrew

Aeyal Gross

Globes

Haaretz

Calcalist

Galai Tzhal

Orna Chillag (wine maker)

Walla

Mako

YNet

Videos

Wine Detective TV (English)

Channel 1 Documentary 12/09 (Hebrew)

Reviewing Kosher Wines with Gary Vaynerchuk (English)

At Wineexpo 2008 (Hebrew)

Rogov’s Tribute Dinner (8/11)

Tasting Israeli Wines for Royal’s KFWE 2011 (Part I)

Tasting Other Kosher Wines for Royal’s KFWE 2011 (Part II)

The Elusive Chameleon (Zinfandel)

#175 – June 2, 2011

As my United States-based subscribers just celebrated the semi-official launch of summer this past Memorial Day, the cooperative warm weather with which we have been blessed ensured that grills up and down America were dusted off for some serious carnivorous activity. For general suggestions on good wine pairings with all that barbequed goodness, check out my Wine & Grilling pairing newsletter from last year (this year’s edition should be distributed around the Fourth of July).

As you will see from that newsletter, Zinfandel is one of the wine varietals that pairs really well with grilled meats and some versions of it make for great barbeque wines (although the main reason it gets trotted out every July 4th as a match to grilling is that its title as America’s wine makes it the right pick for that patriotic day (ironically, it has been proven that Zinfandel actually originated in Croatia). Now, if this newsletter was going to be read by the uninitiated masses, this would be the place for a multitude of jokes about White Zinfandel and its designation as alcoholic fruit juice, the enormous quantities of said fruit juice consumed by the uneducated hordes and the negative impact its production has had on the culture of wine appreciation. However, as the readers of this newsletter are of a higher cultural leaning and whose preferences run towards a gentle Pinot Noir or a smoky Syrah rather than sugary bubble-gum juice, I can tell you that the abomination known worldwide as White Zinfandel actually served a very important part in preserving those glorious old-vine Zinfandel vines from which we derive so much pleasure these days during the decades in which America’s wine appreciation was basically non-existent. Anytime you find yourself enjoying the depth and complexity of a well-made old-vine Zinfandel, remember to saw a silent thank you to Sutter Vineyards, perpetuators of the White Zinfandel which kept those Zin vines from being ripped up as true Zinfandel fell from grace.

While in today’s day and age, wine making ability and technology allows the winemaker to create vastly differing wines from the same grape starting with the care of grapes in the vineyard, through timing the harvest all the way to amount of time the wine spends in oak, Zinfandel stands out in this regard with its ability to provide very different wines as a result of such manipulation from big powerful oak bombs to more restrained and elegant examples of terroir (in addition to coolers of White Zinfandel). However, Zinfandel is most widely known as a big wine with typically high alcohol content (sometimes reaching 16%, with over 14% almost a certainty, a result of the naturally high sugar content), with loads of dark ripe fruit, low tannins and a healthy dose of spice.

In my opinion, one of the reasons that Zinfandel has fallen from favor is a result of the worldwide tread shying away from big, powerful and extracted fruit loaded wines to wines that show more elegance and restraint. However, Zinfandel can very much be utilized to create such wines especially given the fact that its thin skin mandates more Pinot Noir-like treatment than the Cabernet one to which it is usually subjected. The thin skin and low tannins tends to ensure Zins are good for early drinking with relatively low cellarability, although the more premium versions tend to age for 3-7 years. Another major complaint with Zinfandel is their high-alcohol content a result of the grapes naturally high sugar content. Many winemakers will tell you that it’s a heck of a lot easier to make a 17% great Zin than a 13.5% one. In fact, for years, Zinfandel’s unofficial slogan was “no wimpy wines”, coined by Ravenswood, one of the country premier Zinfandel producers. Giving the high sugar content, the timing of picking is crucial for the Zinfandel grape and over-oaking usually results in flavors more akin to a malted than the delightful brambly fruit we are looking for.

Listed below are some notes for some top-notch Zins currently available on the Market. While the kosher versions don’t provide the same level of diversity across the varietal (and White Zinfandel is obviously not included as the list only includes wines), there are a few different types of Zinfandel that showcase the effect that wine making, terroir, oak and other influences can have on the varietal.

Shabbat Shalom
Yossie

Binyamina, Reserve, Zinfandel, 2007: This is a big Zinfandel that spent 15 months in both French and American oak, while managing to retain a relatively low (for Zinfandel, which tends to be higher in alcohol) 14% alcohol level and staying true to the varietal. Typical notes of black pepper and leather match up with ripe raspberries and strawberries. Hints of bittersweet chocolate and mint on a medium finish round out this powerful wine. I enjoyed the wine more on its own than as a match to food.

Baron Herzog, Old Vine Zinfandel, 2006: A lighter Zinfandel than its more exclusive big brother mentioned below, this wine is an easy-drinking wine that matches well with a large variety of dishes, and is well priced to boot. Medium-bodied and well structure, whose tannins well integrated with bold red fruit flavors tinged with earthiness, black cracked pepper and a medium pleasantly rough finish.

Herzog, Zinfandel, Special Reserve, Lodi, 2006: A complex, medium-to full bodied wine with layers of fruit, matched well by an elegant structure and muscular tannins that don’t overpower the aromas and flavors. The wood that was somewhat overbearing a year ago has settled down nicely and serves as a welcome contrast to the raspberries, ripe plums, currants and spices. A long, delicious finish rounds out this treat. Somewhat expensive but worth it with plenty of cellaring time ahead of it.

Dalton, Zinfandel, 2006: The lowest tiered wine from this winery manages to produce a robust, intriguing and full-bodied well integrated wine, truly the mark of a top notch winery. Loads of fruit, including cherries, plums, currants and raspberries on a slightly sweet background but nicely balanced with some spices. The wine serves up plenty of the more traditional Zin notes including pepper, spice, rich black forest fruit and freshly paved road. Blended with a smidgen of Merlot, this wine is drinking beautifully now and will continue to cellar for another couple of years. Well worth seeking out and a YH Best Buy.

Hagafen, Prix Reserve, Moscowite Ranch- Block 61, Zinfandel, 2006: While the Dalton listed below is probably my current favorite Zinfandel, it beats the Hagafen primarily due to it cost-effectiveness. This dark and brooding treasure is filled with loads of gooseberries, blackberries, plums, cherries, cigars and fine bittersweet chocolate. A spicy wine with a dark chocolate finish that is bursting with flavor from start to long delicious finish.

Teperberg Winery



#165 – March 3, 2011

Notwithstanding the massive proliferation of new Israeli wineries, the proper evolution seems to be taking place – wineries keep improving in order to keep up with the competition while bad wineries go out of business. Happily more of the former than the latter is occurring and every time I close my eyes another winery seems to have made a giant leap forward in quality, sophistication and interest. This week’s phoenix is Teperberg and they are truly worthy of the Rags to Riches moniker. Founded in 1870 by the Teperberg family (hence the name(s) of the winery) in the Old City of Jerusalem, the winery relocated in 1964 to Motza, on the outskirts of Jerusalem. Up until recently, the winery was mostly known for producing overly sweet and heavy Kiddush wines that were of no interest to anyone other than the soldiers looking for a Friday-night Kiddush buzz (it was served every Friday night on bases around the country until recently when the Army apparently decided that serving alcoholic beverages to on-duty teen-agers with machine guns wasn’t the best idea and replaced the wine with grape juice).

In the early 1990s, the winery decided to try its hand at making real table wine but didn’t have much success. All this changed in 2002 when, under the supervision of California-trained winemaker Shiki Rauchberger, the winery starting makes much better wines designed to appeal to a more sophisticated audience. A few years ago Teperberg once again relocated to Kibbutz Tzora and officially changed its name to Teperberg 1870 (which it even more recently changed again to drop the 1870).

The winery produces approximately 4 million bottles annually in three series: Reserve, Silver (which is mevushal and provides some good options in that regard) and Terra. They still produce a number of lower-tiered wines which are primarily mass-market wines and of little interest to most wine aficionados. Teperberg still produces too many undesirable wines (and their consistency year-over-year needs improvement) to be a Safe Bet Winery, but they are on definitely on target for that title and their very fair pricing and increased quality have resulted in them having quite a few YH Best Buys in their portfolio. They make a number of blends as well as single varietal wines from Cabernet Sauvignon, Merlot, Sauvignon Blanc, Chardonnay, Riesling, Shiraz and their most interesting wine – a Malbec. As a side note and a follow up to my newsletter from a few weeks ago, while they are producing very good wines worthy of your lirot, with the exception of the Malbec, none of their offerings has really grabbed my attention with creativity, individualism or long-term aging. However, Rome wasn’t built in a day and, with their current and constantly improving track record, I have little doubt that they too, will reach the pinnacle of success. With the addition of Frenchman Olivier Fratty as an assistant wine maker to the team, I look forward to seeing more and more from this team in the coming years.

Shabbat Shalom
Yossie

Teperberg, Reserve, Cabernet Sauvignon, 2007: If Teperberg keeps up this level of quality in their Reserve series, I might be able to forgive them for a slight overstepping on pricing since this is a serious and respectable wine (not to mention delicious). Great structure and somewhat still-firm tannins bode well for the continued development of this wine that is approachable now but will get better with some additional cellaring time. Currants, plums, hints of cassis and blackberry jam along with some asphalt, bittersweet chocolate and some soft and bitter notes make up a complex and delicious wine.

Teperberg, Terra, Sauvignon Blanc, 2010: After spending a week down-under where it is summer and all anyone drinks is New Zealand Sauvignon Blanc, I have a hankering for some crisp and cutting wine, notwithstanding the 50-degree differential from yesterday to today for me. Nice body and structure are complemented by crisp acidity and plenty of citrus fruits on both the nose and the palate. Guava, melon and some passion fruit are accompanied by a tinge of muskiness I found pleasurable.

Teperberg, Silver, Merlot, 2009: A soft and gentle wine with a lusher body than I would have expected for this series. Good blackberries, plums and cranberries are kept on edge with some gentle spiciness, green notes, espresso and cigar box. A long finish rounds out this eminently pleasant (but not for long-term cellaring) YH Best Buy.

Teperberg, Silver, Cabernet Sauvignon, 2009: Tons of rich black forest fruit on a warm nose and mouth filling palate were another surprise for me as I was expecting less depth. A lingering finish with a pleasant bitterness to it rounds this one out.

Teperberg, Terra, Malbec, 2007: Another YH Best Buy and a nice attempt at a grape that has proven elusive in the kosher quality wine category (Royal and Rothschild co-produce another nice version – the Bodegas Flechas de los Andes, Gran Malbec, 2009). Still going strong with currants, cherries, blackberries, espresso, slightly smoky wood, vanilla and chocolate. This was my last bottle for the vintage and a good thing as it probably has 6-9 months left on it, not more

A Match Made in Heaven (Wine & Food Pairing)



#183 – August 28, 2011

After a couple weeks hiatus from the newsletter as a result of a few hectic weeks at work followed by vacation with the kids (certainly no less hectic), this week’s newsletter deals with one of the topics about which I get asked the most – which wine goes with which food and what are some of the most perfect pairings? While more wine than one might think is consumed solo without the natural accompaniment of food, as a general matter I believe food and wine are soul mates that belong together – each bringing something to the table that enhances the other. A quick Internet search will show that there are dozens of websites and apps specially geared to finding those elusive perfect pairings and hundreds of books have been written on the topic. One wine and food pairing axiom has even been enshrined in pop culture by none other than 007 himself in the movie “from Russia with Love” where Bond indicates that not following the rule that “red with meat and white with fish” clearly marks one as a bad guy. Now, while this may not be the most incorrect wine truism out there, it certainly comes from simpler times when food was substantially more homogeneous. In our progressive age of culinary exploration and crossovers, the characteristics of the wine are far more important that its color with the huge variations among wines (Pinot Noir can be more like a white wine masquerading as a red and oaky Chardonnay can be more like a red wine gussied up like a white one).

Now, there is actually quite a bit of controversy around this subject with some schools of thought almost neurotically focusing on the massive importance of making that great match and the horrendous things that could happen to your meal and wine if you make a mistake with your pairing. Given the amount of money generated by the industry it won’t come as a surprise to you that this is the prevailing mindset among the wine professionals who are happy to assist with finding that elusive books with boatloads of material on this topic, some of which can make one feel like a degree in chemistry is required to put a good match together. On the other end of the spectrum are the folks who thing the whole thing is a load of bularky or, even if there is something to it, one should simply drink the wines they like with the food they like and be done with it. Chilean Sea Bass lightly poached in white wine sauce with the 2006 Covenant Cabernet Sauvignon? Go for it!

From my perspective, as with most wine-related items, I tend to believe that one should do with wine that which brings pleasure and enjoyment, regardless of common wisdom or the advice of professionals (other than drinking the blue-bottled abomination which should never be done under any circumstance). If the wines that bring you the most pleasure are the rich and full-bodied Cabernet Sauvignon wines or the full-bodied, oaky and buttery Chardonnays, by all means drink them with your meals and ignore the wine snob snickering. To quote Mark Oldman, the happy fact about wine and food is that, like Pizza, even when bad it can still be pretty good. That said, there is a ton of science behind food pairings (mainly relating to how different food compounds interact with those in the wines) and, as anyone who has ever experienced a really great wine pairing will tell you, a great one can be sublime and forever change a dining experience (for me it was lightly seared Foie Gras with the 2001 Piada) and may be worth the effort. In this week’s newsletter I have provided a few general tips and suggestions that can be helpful in getting folks to think about wine and food in a different way; a manner that will make it easier to create a more harmonious combination of foods and wine that will hopefully elevate your dining experience (at least occasionally) to the truly spectacular – one in which the sum is far greater than the parts.

When thinking about which wines and food go together, one of the most important things to consider are the characteristics of the wine and food in question. The weight of the wine is probably the most important aspect of wine pairing – lighter wines go with lighter food and heavier wines make better pairings with heavier dishes. In order for the concept of pairing to work best, the food and wine shouldn’t overwhelm one another. A delicate and aromatic Pinot Grigio could be obliterated by a heavy meal of beef bourguignon that might more appropriately be matched to a bold Shiraz. The importance of weight in food and wine pairing is the genesis of the white with fish and red with meat rule, but given the dizzying array of ‘weight’ among both fish (tuna and salmon are pretty heavy) and meats (chicken and veal can both be pretty light), one comes to realize how much more there is to wine pairings than such a simplistic cliché.

Another important concept of matching is whether the goal is to achieve a match or a contrast. As an example, a match can be achieved by pairing flavors in the dish with an dominant flavor in the wine (spicy pepper sauce on the steak with the spicy streak in a Zinfandel or the butteryness of an oaky Chardonnay with a fish poached in a sauce heavy on the butter) or by going for a contrast of textures like the crisp acid of a Sauvignon Blanc with the heavy grease of fried foods like potato latkes (or potato chips). Other examples may include a fruity wine with a dish that has a fruit component to it or a wine with some pungent earthiness to it matched to a mushroom dish.

A few components in any wine play a huge part is making good matches – acid, alcohol level, tannin and the sugar levels. Acid in a wine acts like salt on food – it highlights the flavors in the food bringing them into the forefront. As long as the wine is balanced, the more acidity in the wine, the better it will pair with food. Its crispness can also act as a counter balance to fatty foods. Typical high-acid wines include Barbera, Sangiovese and Sauvignon Blanc (most of Four Gates’ wines are pretty acidic, one of the main contributors to their great compatibility with food). High alcohol can overwhelm delicate flavors in a dish creating an unpleasant and slightly bitter sensation but matches nicely with sweet foods (think how most sweet dessert wines are high in alcohol). Tannin, which plays such an important part in the structure, balance and aging ability of those big wines we love, is softened when matched with fatty foods, high in protein like steak or cheese but diminishes sweetness in foods, making them seem dry and bitter which is why drinking a big Cabernet with rich chocolate cake doesn’t result in such a great sensation.

When the thought of coming up with a pairing is overwhelming, there are some food friendly wines that are pretty fail-safe including my personal favorite – Champagne, which pretty much goes with everything with its acidity, refreshing bubbly and relatively low alcohol, crisp dry Rose, Sauvignon Blanc, Pinot Noir, Sangiovese, Riesling (together with top notch Burgundy, one of the biggest holes in the kosher wine world’s repertoire) and Cabernet Franc. On the flip side, when in doubt avoid trophy or big wines like Cabernet Sauvignon (tannin is probably foods biggest enemy, making it taste bland and dry) and Chardonnay (ironically, the two best selling varietals of kosher wine (other than Moscato and semi sweet)). One last tip is that the sauce in a dish can play a far bigger role than the relevant protein or other base component so when pairing wine with a sauced dish, focus on the sauce components which will play a big role in the pairing.

As I mentioned, a future newsletter will deal with specific pairings including cheese, salads, spicy foods, sushi, chocolate and desserts so stay tuned (but a tip for desserts is that the wine needs to be sweeter than the dessert in question). Despite all these tips, remember what you like is most important both in a wine and in any pairing. Sauternes with Foie Gras may be a classic combination but if you don’t like Sauternes (or Foie Gras for that matter); the magic of the pairing is irrelevant. As Red responded to James Bond’s snobbish comment regarding the killer’s choice of fish with Chianti (“the red kind”) in that classic scene in “From Russia with Love”: “you may know your wines but you’re the one on your knees…”

Keeping Your Temper (Serving Temperature)

While the summer heat is enough to drive anyone crazy (just ask Michael Douglas), this weeks newsletter is more about the serving temperature of wine than one’s personal equilibrium. As we get deeper into summer and the mercury continues to rise (giving street creed to global warming enthusiasts world round), my thoughts have been revolving around the temperature (namely how to cool off), which led to this week’s topic – the best temperature at which to consume wine. As we all know, the serving temperature of a liquid plays a huge role in our enjoyment of the beverage (think of warm coke, unsweetened tea or cold chicken soup), all the more so for the nectar of the gods – wine.

By now, most readers of this newsletter know that many commonly known wine truisms aren’t actually true, and there are exceptions to every rule (such as Sean Connery’s affirmation in “From Russia with Love” with respect to the character of deviators from the axiom “red wine with meat and white wine with fish”). That said, one truism that makes sense and is grounded in science is that [most] red wines should be served at room temperature and [most] white (rosé and sparkling) wines should be served chilled (as with most “rules”, there are plenty of exceptions some of which are covered in this edition).

The majority of people know that red wines are supposed to be served at room temperature. However, most folks are unsure what exactly that means? Given that the temperature of any given room deviates tremendously from country to country and from season to season, there is no clear answer to this question. These days, classic room temperature for Americans is about 72F (22C) and for the French about 65F (18C). Back in the days of drafty old English Castles and dank French Château, “room temperature” meant 62-65F (16-18C) and even that was at high noon on a summer day. A result, red wines are often served too warm. To quote Hugh Johnson, “people should forget they ever heard of the concept of room temperature in connection with drinking wine”.

In this newsletter I provide some temperature ranges for different types of wines (including a handy chart at the bottom) but, as with most things in life and certainly where wine appreciation is concerned, your own palate is the one that matters most. Use the suggestions as guidelines but find the right temperature that provides maximum enjoyment for your palate, regardless of what others may tell you (I have gotten pushback in restaurants when requesting that a red wine be slightly chilled after it arrived at the table as if from a warm bubble bath).

With respect to red wine – the general rule of room temperature is a decent place to start. As a general rule, tannins (predominately present in red wines) don’t like the cold as it can harshen their bitterness and make a rich tannic red wine taste even more astringent. Thus, high tannin red wines like Cabernet Sauvignon should avoid any chill and are best appreciated around 65F. However, slight chill on many red wines can focus the flavors in a red wine and reduce the perception of its alcohol level (a handy side effect in this day and age of overly alcoholic wines). The fruitier, lighter and less tannic wines like Beaujolais, Pinot Noir, Chianti and Rioja are good candidates for being served chilled (think of them as white wines dressed in red clothing – light, fresh, low tannins, high fruit and low alcohol). With respect to red wines, it’s best to err on the side of caution and serve the wines a little overly chilled than too warm. A wine served over 65F will show mostly alcohol and present as too “hot”. Additionally, it’s a lot quicker to chill a bottle down than to [safely] warm it up. If the wine is too warm, either put the wine in a fridge for 10 minutes or if no refrigerator is available (i.e. you are in a restaurant), ask for an ice bucket filled with ice and water and chill the wine for a few minutes to bring the temperature down a notch or two. Just be prepared for horrified looks and a lecture or too about how wines need to be served at “room temperature”. At the same time, avoid over-chilling your red wine as it can cause the fruit to disappear, resulting in a wine showing as one-dimensional (one of the reasons that cheaper wines show better well chilled which tends to hide their flaws). If your wine is served too cold never heat it up by placing it near a heat source like the sun, oven or (gasp) microwave – these will harm the wine and cause it to become stewed and overly-soupy. Just warm it gently cupped in your hand with some gentle swirling and you will be good to go in no time.

For white wines, the basic concept of serving them chilled holds true as well – to a point. The cold allows the crucial acidity in the wine to be most effective and the relatively low level of tannins avoids the bitterness issue we see with red wines. However, most white wines are served overly chilled which tends to subdue aromas and nuances of flavor and create a flabby sensation in your mouth (think of eating a frozen banana – no nuance of flavor or aroma). Now, the concept of something being too cold is a tough argument to make in the US where we are obsessed with the cold, dumping ice cubes galore into anything and everything. To quote Eric Asimov “we fetishize cold beer to the extent of marketing a brand by promising it will provide an icier experience” (he is a bit crazed over overly chilled white wines). If you get a white wine that is too cold, warm the wine in your glass, a process that will provide a delightful aromatic experience as the wine comes to its perfect drinking temperature. Just avoid allowing the wine to become too warm as many white wines become almost bitter when they are served at too warm temperatures.

As chilling wine emphasizes its sweetness, dessert wines should always be served chilled – the sweeter the wine, the colder it should be. However, if the wine has a light sparkle (as opposed to sparkling wine) when poured, it has been over-chilled. Sparkling wine also benefits from serious chilling which serves to accentuate its crisp and refreshing character by improving the texture of the wine.

As a quick aside, not only do different temperatures seriously affect the taste and pleasure derived from wine, different barometric pressures at varying altitudes can change the chemical balance of a wine. A number of years ago I conducted an experiment and tried the same wine (a Golan Heights Winery, Yarden, Cabernet Sauvignon, 2001) at the lowest place on earth (the Dead Sea) where it tasted somewhat flat and then a few days later in Katzrin on the Golan Heights (and the wines actual birthplace) where it was truly magnificent! Go figure…

I have included some wines and mentioned the relevant temperatures at which they should be enjoyed.

Carmel, Single Vineyard – Kayoumi, Cabernet Sauvignon, 2007: Carmel’s chief winemaker Lior Lacser must spend his nights sprinkling the Kayoumi vineyard with angel dust, as there is something truly magical about this vineyard which produces an incredible Shiraz in addition to this magnificent and powerful Cabernet Sauvignon. Both powerful and elegant, this wine is full-bodied with great structure and harmony among the wood, fruit, tannin and acid. Give this wine a little time in the glass to open up and you will be rewarded with aromas of red cherries and currants, gooseberries, tart plums and cigar box followed by a fruit and earthy palate with slightly darker fruits, tobacco leaf, bittersweet chocolate, mildly spicy oak and muscular yet well integrated mouth coating tannins. A long lingering finish reminds you that it’s time for the next glass. Avoid chilling this wine as its rich tannins will rapidly become bitter if served too cold.

Dalton, Zinfandel, 2006: The lowest tiered wine from this winery manages to produce a robust, intriguing and full-bodied well integrated wine, truly the mark of a top notch winery. Loads of fruit, including cherries, plums, currants and raspberries on a slightly sweet background but nicely balanced with some spices. The wine serves up plenty of the more traditional Zinfandel notes including pepper, spice, rich black forest fruit and freshly paved road. Blended with a smidgen of Merlot, this wine is drinking beautifully now and will continue to cellar for another couple of years. Well worth seeking out and a YH Best Buy. As with the Kayoumi above, this rich wine will become bitter if too chilled.

Borgo Reale, Pinot Noir, Puglia, 2009: One of the few Italian wines I tasted that wasn’t made from an “Italian Grape”. While well made and eminently drinkable at 12.5% alcohol, I’m not sure what the point was in making an Italian Pinot. In any event, a well balanced wine with good structure, soft tannins, and near sweet fruit including red cherries, dried cranberries, cassis, overlaid with toasty oak and a hint of black pepper. A light and fun wine that might benefit from a bit of the chill (or even an ice cube).

Covenant, Lavan, Russian River, 2009: After the success of the 2008 vintage I was super-excited to try the 2009, and it did not disappoint. Sourced from a single vineyard in the Carneros section of Napa Valley, the wine was blended from two Chardonnay clones (Robert Young and Wente) and the difference in vineyards is easily distinguished even though the style remains the same – that of a powerful and sophisticated California Chardonnay that avoids being overly oaky and buttery, with hints of Burgundy. Tons of pear, apricots, peaches and figs on the nose and palate, accompanied by vanilla, oak and hints of spiciness. Slightly more mineral notes and less caramel than the 2008. A delicious and refreshing wine with plenty of acidity to keep everything honest. A long and slightly finish rounds out this very refreshing wine that will continue to cellar nicely for another 5 years. 350 cases were produced. Chill this wine too far down and you will miss out on the aromatic bounty this wine has to offer.

Teperberg, Terra, Sauvignon Blanc, 2010: After spending a week down-under where it is summer and all anyone drinks is New Zealand Sauvignon Blanc, I have a hankering for some crisp and cutting wine, notwithstanding the 50-degree differential from yesterday to today for me. Nice body and structure are complemented by crisp acidity and plenty of citrus fruits on both the nose and the palate. Guava, melon and some passion fruit are accompanied by a tinge of muskiness I found pleasurable. A crisp wine that is perfect for the summer, drink this one a bit colder than usual and enjoy the aromatic release as it warms in your hands.

Tools of Choice (Wine Tools & Gadgets)


#127 – May 14, 2010


While this newsletter usually talks about kosher wine and the amazing wineries that produce top-notch wine, from time to time I also try to provide some basic advice or guidance on how to generally enhance your enjoyment of wine. Some of these annual or bi-annual topics I have covered in the past include how to order wine in restaurants, the correct serving temperature for different wines, comparative tasting and how to choose a wine glass (and the effect such a choice has on your enjoyment of your wine).

As with anything in life, having the appropriate tools is of the utmost importance and the enjoyment of good vino is no exception. While the unfortunate fact that the vast majority of wine purchased is consumed the same day it is acquired (or within a very short time) makes good storage capabilities less important; if you never store wine for an extended period of time, you will never get to experience one of the greatest pleasure of enjoying wine – experiencing a wine as it develops, ages and matures over time, sometimes evolving into a completely different being. This is one of the main reasons I suggest purchasing a number of bottles of certain wines and enjoying a bottle every six months to a year in order to experience, enjoy and wonder at its exciting development.

In order to participate in this magnificent journey you need to store (or cellar) your precious bottles under appropriate conditions. While the term “cellaring” your wine conjures images of glorious, below ground, wine-cellars covered with wall-to-wall redwood racks stacked with bottles of Yatir Forest, Capcanes Peraj Ha’abib, Yarden Single Vineyard Ortal Cabernet and other assorted goodies; it really just means a “safe” place to keep your bottles of wine while they are undergoing to evolutionary process.

By “safe” place I mean a dark, cool place in which your wine will not be exposed to direct sunlight, excessive heat or vibrations (which wreak havoc on a wine’s development), strong odors (given the porous nature of the cork, these will seep into and destroy your wine) that will also provide you with the ability for the bottle to lay on its side. This is necessary in order to keep the cork moist which prevents it from drying out, shrinking and exposing your wine to excessive amount of oxygen which, in the wrong quantities, is a wine killer.

Now, if you live in a geographical area that isn’t exposed to extended periods of extremely dry and hot weather (i.e. the Hermon, Alaska, Siberia and the like), the bottom of a closet not near and outside wall is probably sufficient for shorter periods and a cheap wine rack will solve the horizontal issue as well). To the extent you like in a place with hot summers like Tel-Aviv, Ra’anana, New York, Los Angeles, Miami Beach and others, you are going to need a better option. While you can spend insane amounts of money on various options ranging from installing a climate-controlled “cellar” in your basement (or apartment for that matter) to a 2000 bottle Euro Cave wine fridge (the Euro Cave fridge’s are almost triple the price but are truly excellent and worth the price). Thankfully, you can get a decent wine fridge for $100-200 that will hold up to 50 bottles of wine which should be a good start for anyone wanting to start building a cellar (see here for some specific recommendations for wines that are good candidates for long-term cellaring).

Another very important tool is a cork-screw. While almost every home I have ever been in has one, they are usually that embarrassing piece of engineering called the “double lever” corkscrew in which the two side levers rise as you screw into the wine. This is probably the worst cork screw on the planet and a border line health hazard (for you and your wines). It is dangerous, inevitably breaks and will destroy a cork at any occasion it gets. The absolute best corkscrew to have is the simple “waiter’s corkscrew’ that will open any bottle, any time. The better ones have a double edged lever for different height bottles and a cool knife tool to slice off the foil top of the wine – it’s pretty cheap to boot. While those massive “rabbit” devices do get the job done, they are extremely expensive, heavy and cumbersome and should not be trotted out just because you got them as a gift. If there was ever a perfect excuse for a re-gift – the rabbit is it! For very old/crumbly corks.

Some other ancillary tools include a foil-cutter which is a handy gadget for cutting off the foil top of a bottle of wine without risking slicing off a finger, various items to wrap around the bottle’s neck to prevent dripping, vacuum stoppers for both wine and Champagne (which enable you to remove some of the oxygen from the bottle before stopping it up in the unfortunate incident that you opened but didn’t finish a bottle of wine).

Carmel Winery



#176 – June 16, 2011 (more recent update)

For this shipment of the Leket Wine Club we showcased one of Israel’s oldest wineries; one that has undergone the most impressive rejuvenation of a winery in recent times – the Carmel Winery.

Despite the fact that Israelis have over the last decade seriously increased their wine appreciation and consumption to an average annual consumption of 5 liters per person, they still lag behind other wine drinking countries such as the United States (11 liters per person) and France (60 liters per person), and the majority of wine sold in Israel is of the “supermarket” variety. Now these supermarket wines are not to be knocked as, in addition to providing the major wineries with the revenue stream that enables them to produce the high-end wines we love and enjoy, these wines play an important part in introducing new wine drinkers to the pleasures of wine consumption, priming them for more sophisticated wines later on. Therefore, the quality of lower level offerings from the major wineries is just as important as the magnificent flagship wines.

There was a period a few years ago when boutique wineries were all the rage and wine lovers tended to disregard the offerings of the larger wineries as uninteresting. However, the larger wineries have since risen to the challenge and are all now producing boutique-type wines in addition to the plethora of entry-level wines they all have in their portfolio and these days, Carmel Winery not only fits that description, it’s at the vanguard of the movement.

Carmel was established in 1882 with the help of Baron Rothschild, owner of the famed Château Lafite, as a vintner’s cooperative in Rishon Lezion. The Baron hoped that wine would play a big part in the economic security of the newly established Jewish settlements and invested a substantial amount of his personal time and fortune in building wineries and developing the local vineyards (the first vines planted were Château Lafite cuttings). Unfortunately, this economic benefit was not meant to be for a number of reasons. In addition to substantial over-planting (to such a degree that a few years into the endeavor, so many vineyards had been planted that many had to be uprooted and converted to other crops), two potential lucrative markets for Israeli wine evaporated in the early 1900s. The Russian wine market was suppressed by the 1917 revolution (and didn’t recover until the 1940s) and the American market evaporated in 1919 with the enactment of the 18th Amendment to the United States constitution resulting in Prohibition.

While Carmel has a rich past with 120 harvests under its belt (they have never missed a harvest which is pretty impressive considering Israel’s 120 year history) and multiple Israeli luminaries holding early positions there including Prime Ministers from Ben Gurion to Olmert, for most of its storied history it produced mainly sweet sacramental wines, grape juice and pure plonk. However, over the last ten years, Carmel underwent major financial, administrative and winemaking changes and moved into brand new facilities, all of which have resulted in its rebirth as a top notch wine making powerhouse producing magnificent wines such as its flagship Limited Edition Bordeaux-type blend and Single Vineyard wines from the magnificent Kayoumi (and other) vineyards.

Today Carmel accounts for just under 50% of Israel’s total wine production, producing approximately 15 million bottles a year across many series and price ranges, from grapes grown on over 3,000 acres spread across the country. In addition to the Limited Edition and Single Vineyard series, they produce wines under the following labels: Appellation (Regional), Private Collection, Ridge, Selected, Young Selected and a few other miscellaneous wines.

While the excellence of Carmel is obvious to anyone who tastes its flagship wines, it also shines through with their mid and lower tiered series of wines including the Appellation series and the Private Collection series. Long a graveyard for mediocre wines, the Private Collection series is now a beacon of light for any winery desiring top quality wines at affordable prices. The Private Collection Chardonnay we have included in this shipment is a clear indicator of the evolution of quality that Carmel in general and this series in particular has undergone and is a perfect wine with which to welcome the oncoming warmer spring weather we are experiencing.

Easily recognizable by its funky ancient animal labels, the wines of the Appellation series are interesting and consistently delicious across the board with every wine being a recommended one. It is in this series that Carmel’s creativity and desire to push the envelope of commercial wine making is most visible with great wines from previously unpopular varietals such as old vine Petite Sirah, Carignan and Cabernet Franc (which is included in this shipment) in addition to more mainstream Cabernet Sauvignon, Merlot, Sauvignon Blanc and Chardonnay.
Additionally, with the guiding hand of their wine director, Adam Montefiore, Carmel is also at the forefront of Israel’s push towards terroir-based wines that are more reflective of Israel’s Mediterranean characteristics and less internationalized, with the delicious Mediterranean wine (included in this shipment) being the flag bearer of this push.

While Carmel’s resurgence has been underway for long enough that it is probably no longer news (in the same vein that kosher wine should really stop having to deal with the ever-present reference to Manischewitz), it has garnered substantial recognition from significant international wine authorities, including most recently the United Kingdom’s Decanter. In a massive honor for Carmel, the Single Vineyard Kayoumi Shiraz was awarded the 2010 Decanter World Wine Award for a Rhone varietal in the upper price category, and the Appellation Old Vine Petite Sirah 2006 won the Wine of the Month award for July 2010 (only the third Israeli wine to win this award).

Carmel, Mediterranean, 2007: Over the last couple of years, one of the hot discussion topics among Israeli/kosher wine aficionados has revolved around marketing practices for promoting the excellent Israeli wines beyond their current and natural “kosher” niche. Current prevailing wisdom is that in order to succeed, Israel needs to find an Israeli varietal that would help Israeli wines be promoted as Israeli/Mediterranean (as opposed to Israeli/kosher) – i.e. wines from Israel that are representative of Israel’s unique terrior and characteristics. Additionally, Carmel (together with other Israeli wineries) is following the worldwide trend of moving away from internationalized powerhouse wines to a more elegant style. As mentioned above, Carmel is at the forefront of this revolution and this wine (evidenced by its name) is a premier example. An interesting and elegant blend of 37% Carignan, 26% Shiraz, 20% Petit Verdot, 15% Petite Sirah and 2% Viognier, with the various varietals coming together beautifully. The sum is far greater than the parts as each grape contributes some of its unique persona to a great wine. Loads of fruit on the nose including plums, raspberries, cranberries and cassis, together with velvety and near sweet tannins. The palate mostly follows the nose with the pleasing addition of milk chocolate, earthy forest floor, cedar box, warm spices and tobacco leaf, which all blend together into an extremely well balanced and pleasing medley flavors. A long and caressing finish rounds out this delightful wine [included in the Kerem membership].

Carmel, Single Vineyard – Kayoumi, Cabernet Sauvignon, 2007: Carmel’s chief winemaker Lior Lacser must spend his nights sprinkling the Kayoumi vineyard with angel dust, as there is something truly magical about this vineyard which produces an incredible Shiraz in addition to this magnificent and powerful Cabernet Sauvignon. Both powerful and elegant, this wine is full-bodied with great structure and harmony among the wood, fruit, tannin and acid. Give this wine a little time in the glass to open up and you will be rewarded with aromas of red cherries and currants, gooseberries, tart plums and cigar box followed by a fruit and earthy palate with slightly darker fruits, tobacco leaf, bittersweet chocolate, mildly spicy oak and muscular yet well integrated mouth coating tannins. A long lingering finish reminds you that it’s time for the next glass [included in both memberships].

Carmel, Appellation, Cabernet Franc, 2007: I love Cabernet Franc wine and was quite happy that Carmel decided to revive it for this series (there hasn’t been one for years). In my opinion, Cabernet Franc is a top contender for “Israel’s Varietal”, as it seems to truly flourish on its soil. A medium bodied wine with plenty of red fruit on the nose and palate including cherries and dried cranberries with plenty of oak to provide a nice backbone of vanilla and tobacco leaf to back up the fruit. Much of the same on the palate with the additional and welcome hints of dark chocolate on the front end and tinged with mint and eucalyptus on the medium finish. Aged in French oak for ten months and blended with 8% of Petit Verdot and 7% Malbec that give it a distinct personality that is different from other 100% Israeli Cabernet Franc wines I have enjoyed [included in both memberships].

Carmel, Private Collection, Chardonnay, 2009: For decades the Private Collections wines were just that – wines that were so bad they needed to be kept private and not shown to or shared with anyone. Upon tasting this wine and others from the series, I was amazed at the leap in quality. A medium bodied Chardonnay with good acidity that manages to have nice oak influences without being burdened by it. Good apple, pear and citrus flavors on both the nose and palate with hints of melon coming through as well on the palate. An easy drinking and quite refreshing wine that is perfect for the newly arrived warm weather we are experiencing [included in the Kerem membership].

When in Rome…



#174 – May 19, 2011

One of the recent trends of the kosher wine world has been the massive increases in quality across the board. From the table-wines produced by the major Israeli wineries to the boutique offerings made by various garagistes, more and more quality kosher wine is being produced these days from around the world (discussed in some detail in my “Trending Upwards” newsletter). In addition to fine offerings from Israel, France and California which have been around for a while, this increased quality has allowed the kosher wine lover to avail himself of good kosher wines from around the world including French Sauternes, New Zealand Sauvignon Blanc, Argentinean Malbec, Old Vine Grenache from Spain and many others. At the same time, there is plenty of room for growth in this area as we are not yet blessed with quality offerings from Alsace (although some recent offerings from Willm show promise), Austria or Burgundy to name just a few.

Until recently, Italian wines would have topped this list of regions for the kosher wine world to conquer. Despite Italy’s long & rich Jewish past and the fact that Italy is among the world leaders in wine consumption and production; historically very little notable kosher Italian wines were available. Thankfully recent years have shown an improvement in the quality, variety and sophistication of Italian kosher wines. While most available kosher Italian wines are still quaffers (albeit pleasant ones), they are much better than they used to be and continue to show marked improvement year after year which bodes well for the future. Over the last few weeks I tasted a number of the kosher Italian wines available from various producers with two notable exceptions. Two Italian producers – Falesco and Feudi di san Gregorio – produce kosher wines that I did not have an opportunity to taste but I have heard are quite good and among the best (and most expensive) kosher Italy has to offer.

Before we get into the specifics of the wines I tasted, a few words on Italy and wine in general. Wine is an extremely integral part of Italian life, even more so than with the French, a concept evidenced by the proliferation of grapevines throughout the country which grow literally everywhere. To quote Karen MacNeil “they are Italy’s version of the American lawn”. This love of wine goes back centuries with the ancient Greeks naming Italy Oenotria, meaning the “land of wine”. The varietal output from the almost 1,000,000 registered vineyards in Italy is mind-numbing and insanely humbling to any oenophile, professional or otherwise; as mastering Italy’s wine is a given impossibility. Adding to the confusion is, while New World countries like the US and Australia tend to label their wines by varietal (i.e. Shiraz, Merlot, etc.) and Old World countries like France tend to label their wines by region (i.e. Sauternes, Burgundy, etc.), Italian wines area an incomprehensible mix of both (i.e. Barolo is a place while Barbera is a varietal).

While the majority of Italian wines are simple quaffers, made for easy drinking with Italian cuisine, Italy also produces a number of complex and rich world famous wines including Barolo, Barbaresco, Super Tuscans (see below) and Brunello di Montalcino, in addition to top-notch versions of Chianti and Moscato d’Asti. Some of the most exciting wines come from one of three major wine growing regions (out of Italy’s total 20 regions) – Piedmont, Tuscany and Tre Venezie (three northeastern regions – Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Trentino-Alto Adige and the Veneto).

As with France, Italy has a complex appellation system for categorizing wines that includes two tiers – an upper tier for region specific wines and a lower tier for table wines. The upper tier regions are split into two categories – the DOC (covering ~300 areas) and DOCG (covering ~20). To receive the DOC or DOCG appellation, the wines must conform to certain requirements including with respect to alcohol levels, percentage of varietals used, vineyard yield and others. The even stricter DOCG (enacted in the late 80s) included taste and other tasting of the wines to ensure conformity with the rules. Many aspiring winemakers felt these regulations stifled creativity and limited experimentation as they were based on traditional Italian methods of wine making that were slow to evolve. During the 1970s, many Italian wine makers revolted against these regulations and created new brands of wine that didn’t conform to the DCO regulations and were forced to carry the label of lowly table wines. However, as a result of including non-Italian grapes (such as Cabernet Sauvignon and Merlot) in their blends and French oak barrels, the resulting wines were spectacularly rich and complex resulting in increasing popularity and them taking on the nom de guerre Super Tuscans, a name they carry to this day.

Given the uncommonly vast number of microclimates spread throughout Italy, it’s tough to label Italian wines with any specific flavor or textural profile – wines grown two rows apart from each other in the same vineyard may end up tasting vastly different despite a similar winemaking process and techniques. These microclimates are a result of Italy’s zany topography of mountains, hills and valleys, all juxtaposed without any seeming rhyme or rhythm. This rapid change from hill to mountain to valley, combined with its proximity to four major bodies of water (the Mediterranean, Adriatic, Ligurian and Tyrrhenian seas) has produced a crazy jumble of environments – all of which produce wine! That said, most of the wines I tasted were medium bodied and crying out for food with soft tannins, hints of earth and high acid. These wines were very different from the internationalized version of wines we have become accustomed to in the kosher wine world. When drinking these wines one must not make mental comparisons in depth, complexity and richness to those tannic Cabernet Sauvignons we are used to drinking that are loaded with fruit and wood (even if well balanced), but rather enjoy them in their own category and see if they bring you pleasure – I think they will. I note that almost all the wines I tried needed some substantial air to be appropriately appreciated which, while surprising for a lower priced and quaffer wine, isn’t the end of the world and most reviewed below were worth the effort.

From a food pairing perspective, a good rule of thumb is wines from a certain country go well with the native cuisine. For Italian wines this is especially true as many of Italy’s native grapes like Nebbiolo and Sangiovese produce tart and acidic wines that, while they can be unpleasant on their own, become softer and more interesting when matched with oil-based Italian cuisine such as marinated peppers, pasta, pizza, Insalata Caprese and other tomato-based foods, veal and cheese based dishes and the like. Heck, wine is a food staple in Italy, typically being one of the cheaper staples on any Italians shopping list (again, referring to the rustic quaffers as few Italian housewives are bringing home a $100 Brunello for their pasta dinners).

Listed below are notes from a number of the wines that I tasted. Disclaimer: For the first time in the six years I have been writing this newsletter, a number of the wines I tasted for this newsletter were provided to me as samples by the relevant importer/distributor.

Borgo Reale, Chianti Classico, Vespertino, 2007: Initially there didn’t seem to be anything to this wine with a very closed nose and tight palate. However, after 30 minutes in the glass it opened somewhat with tart cherries, plums, cranberries and a hint of chocolate on the nose which, for the most part, followed through onto the palate along with chunky and well integrated tannins (on first sip this wine is acidic and bitter – it needs that time in your glass so give it a chance to settle down). Tasted the next day, the wine was even softer and better balanced but the fruits had faded somewhat. For the happy medium, I suggest opening this wine a few hours before you plan to serve it and pouring it 30 minutes prior (better yet, decant it and taste as it develops). Open and taste right away and you probably won’t like this wine, give it the care it needs and you will be rewarded with a well-priced and enjoyable Chianti Classico (meaning it’s from the higher-quality hilly part of Tuscany’s Chianti district).

Bartenura, Ovadia Estates, Chianti, 2009: Given my history with Bartenura’s prior mediocre offerings I was prepared to dislike this wine and was pleasantly surprised. Somewhat high alcohol (14.5%) for a medium bodied and easy going wine, but the alcohol wasn’t offensive for me. Slightly richer out of the bottle than many of the other Chianti wines I tried, with soft and well-integrated tannins (perhaps due to the 20% blend of grapes added to the typical Sangiovese). A slightly candy nose with some fruit, though not much. Will go nicely with pizza or spaghetti in addition to many other foods. In short – a nice quaffer.

Terra di Seta, Pellegrini della Seta, Chianti Classico, 2008: Terra di Seta is the only kosher winery in Italy, using organic grapes and currently producing this Chianti and a Toscana wine. Made from 95% Sangiovese with 5% Cabernet Sauvignon blended in and aged in French oak for six months, this was a delightful wine that also benefited from some airing out. Plenty of red fruit including cherries, cassis and raspberries on both the nose and palate with hints of lavender, earth, slightly spicy oak and mouth coating tannins. A decently long finish rounded up this Chianti with some fruit and espresso coffee coming together nicely.

Borgo Reale, Pinot Noir, Puglia, 2009: One of the few Italian wines I tasted that wasn’t made from an “Italian Grape”. While well made and eminently drinkable at 12.5% alcohol, I’m not sure what the point was in making an Italian Pinot. In any event, a well balanced wine with good structure, soft tannins, and near sweet fruit including red cherries, dried cranberries, cassis, overlaid with toasty oak and a hint of black pepper.

Borgo Reale, Signi, Brunello di Montalcino, Tuscany, 2005: We have had kosher Barolo, Chianti and Moscato galore but to my knowledge, this wine the only kosher Brunello available. While lacking the searing tannins of the typical Brunello (that usually require at least 10 years of cellar aging to settle down) which are one of the most distinguishing characteristics of this noble Italian wine, the wine is a pleasure to drink (if not necessarily worth the $50 price tag). As with most Italian wines I have tried, the various components needed some air to open up and play nice together, but once they did, the wine presented as a nice medium bodied wine that is much better with food than on its own. Hints of violets on the nose with nice red fruit, acid, soft tannins and oak on both the nose and palate, those well balanced after 15-20 minutes in the glass. Following the fruit were hints of graphite, cigar box and a touch of espresso leading into a medium finish. A few sommeliers with whom I tasted this wine, told me that it was nothing like a true Brunello (mostly due its approachability at youth and relative lack of complexity).

Cantina Gabirele Montepulciano d Abruzzo, Tuscany, 2008: I am not a big fan of most Cantina Gabriele wines as I usually find them to be slightly off balance with one of the fruit, acid or wood usually being somewhat overbearing (typically acid in the whites & wood in the woods) but not this one. A simple and easy drinking light to medium bodied wine; but one with nice red fruit including raspberries, cherries and cassis and soft caressing tannins that are near invisible with some pleasing bitterness rising up on the finish. A nice match with pasta dishes and I could even envision dropping an ice cube in this one on a hot summer day (gasp).

Covenant Winery

#173 – May 11, 2011

Over the last couple months (newsletters #140, 147, 148 & 163), I have written about California’s numerous kosher wineries and winemakers, all of which are making some truly impressive wines. These wineries range from the Herzog juggernaut who have been making kosher wine for eight generations, to young upstarts like the Weiss brothers, whose first commercial vintage of awesome Syrah-based wines was in 2008, and are producing wines with names like “1-2 Punch” & “Power to the People” decorated with über-cool labels. This week, that cycle comes full circle as we discuss the winery behind what Robert Parker has referred to as the “best kosher wine in America” – Covenant (whose flagship wine sports one of the most stunningly beautiful labels I have ever seen).

As opposed to many of the wineries I discuss, and notwithstanding it’s relatively small scale production and recent launch (in 2005), Covenant seems to get far more press than some of the other more established wineries like Herzog and Hagafen. Many stories have been written about co-owner and chief winemaker Jeff Morgan’s journey from nearly a decade living as a musician in France to making some of the world’s best kosher wines (including a nice write-up in the New York Times that can be seen here), so I will try not to repeat what has already been extensively documented. There are probably a number of reasons for this publicity including Morgan’s journalistic past which includes multiple cookbooks, stints of wine writing for the Wine Spectator and writing countless wine and food articles for many publications including the New York Times, Food & Wine and the Wine Enthusiast. Jeff was also wine director for Dean and DeLuca which is the context in which he met Leslie Rudd, co-owner of Covenant. Another reason is certainly the multitude of accolades won by his flagship wine – Covenant, including praise from Robert Parker, arguably the world’s most influential wine critic (although there is plenty of discussion and controversy on his influence). All said, the recognition primarily stems from the glorious product they are making, which truly (and more importantly, consistently) includes, one of the world’s best kosher wines (although as kosher wines gets better, this list gets longer and longer) – the Covenant Cabernet Sauvignon.

Together with associate winemaker Jonathan Hajdu (who in his spare time makes the incredible Brobdignanian wines featured in newsletter #148), Covenant was launched in 2005 to great and well-deserved fanfare for their initial 2003 vintage. Initially Covenant was housed by Herzog in their Oxnard facility and in 2008 moved to its own home in Napa Valley. This move led to greater control over the wine making process and a slight change in style that primarily resulted from increased control over the wine making process and significantly more “hands-on” access to the wines (noticed primarily in the Red C of that vintage which was their best yet). With the move to their own facility, Jeff and Jonathon are now using only native yeast fermentation and stirring the lees on their red wines (a common practice for white wines but thought to add depth and personality to reds as well). As always, they go for full malolactic fermentation and typically barrel ferment in 40-50% new oak.

The winery currently produces three wines – the flagship Covenant Cabernet Sauvignon, the Red C and an incredible Chardonnay called Lavan. A 2010 Sauvignon Blanc will be released later this summer and there is talk of some small scale special stuff in the works, so stay tuned as I’m sure it will be incredible and well-worth seeking out. Among others, a defining characteristic I find in Covenant’s wines is muscular and robust tannins that manage to be soft, velvety and well-integrated, even upon release.

The flagship Covenant Cabernet Sauvignon is produced every year from free-run juice only derived from grapes sourced from a small 3 acre parcel in the Larkmead Vineyard located in Calistoga (originally planted in 1889). Grapes from this parcel used to go into Rudd’s Cabernet Sauvignon before his own acclaimed vineyards were ready. In 2007, Covenant launched a second 100% Cabernet Sauvignon wine named “Red C” from the 2005 vintage, a blend of the press wine from the Covenant grapes and free run wine from varying vineyards (until 2008, the Young Family Vineyard just outside St. Helena). 2010 saw two exciting new releases from Covenant, both from the 2008 vintage. The first was a Chardonnay, initially sourced from the Bacigalupi Vineyard (same immediate location as Château Montelena’s Chardonnay which is the famed wine that beat the overalls off the French back in 1976). The second was an über-premium wine made, for the first time, from Leslie Rudd’s grapes that Jeff had been trying to get his hands on since he started Covenant. Called Covenant Solomon (Rudd’s Hebrew name); the wine was a limited production run and its cost of $150 reflected the high cost of fruit from Rudd’s vineyards. It took 5 award winning vintages to convince Rudd that a Covenant wine made from his grapes would bring honor to his name (personally, I would have been convinced after the 2003 vintage, but hey – that’s just me). As with Covenant, the Solomon is made from 100% Cabernet Sauvignon grapes sourced from a few parcels of Rudd’s vineyards located on Mount Veeder and the Oakville Valley floor.

The sole Achilles heel of Covenant wines has been its relatively high price (approximately $85 for Covenant Cabernet Sauvignon and $35-40 for Red C and the Lavan), but as the prices for all the top-tier wines have risen dramatically in the last couple of years, it is now on par with its peer top-tier kosher wines, and still cheaper than a lot of the French stuff rolling around (notwithstanding the price differential between Israeli and Napa Valley Grapes, Israeli premiums seem to be priced on par with Covenant far too often). Given its non-mevushal status, you are more likely to find Covenant on the wine list at the non-kosher Spago than Solo.

While I have tasted every wine from every vintage Covenant has produced, I have included below only a few of my favorites from over the years, including the unbelievable 2003 and the recently released Solomon.

One of the best things about Jeff and Jonathon is their infectious enthusiasm, which really shines through in any conversation with them about wine, Judaism or almost any other topic I have broached. While not observant, Jeff certainly takes immense pride in his Jewish heritage and channels that pride and spirituality into his winemaking– truly a man on a mission; the mission being to enhance Jewish life through the creation of the best wine in the world. So Jeff – while I can’t speak for the Jewish people as a whole, I’d say “so far so good”!

SOLOMON

Covenant, Solomon, Cabernet Sauvignon, 2008: Leslie Rudd finally granted Jeff his wish and allowed a Covenant wine to be made from his coveted and acclaimed Napa Valley grapes with darn good results. While produced in basically the same manner as the Covenant, the Solomon presents more fruit forward, Napa Valley-like, with really plush fruit (without being overly ripe), including plums, currants, blackberries, raspberries, black cherry, rich back earth and well integrated tannins. As with all Covenant wines, a deep and complex wine with layer after layer of fruit, wood and chocolate. One of the more expensive kosher wines at about $150, but a great comparison with the regular 2008 Cabernet Sauvignon that allows you to experience the difference the actual fruit can make in a wine. A wine blessed with longevity, I look forward to tasting this wine again over the coming years and will, g-d willing¸ serve it at Ilana’s Bat-Mitzvah in 10 years.

COVENANT

Covenant, Cabernet Sauvignon, 2003: This first vintage of Covenant was a clear indicator of the future greatness of a winery that has not yet disappointed, and is still drinking amazingly these days. Later vintages have proven to be spectacular as well, but I have a special affinity for the 2003. A full bodied wine with aromas and flavors of cherries, plums, blackberries and violets with pleasing notes of oak, some herbaceousness and a hint of vanilla. At its peak now with tannins that are seamlessly integrated with all that fruit, leading into a long luxurious and somewhat spicy finish that seems to have developed over recent years and is now locked, cocked and ready to rock with tobacco, cedar and more fruit. Recently enjoyed, this wine provided me with a near-magical drinking experience and totally justified the high price tag Jeff demands for his wines. The wine should continue to cellar nicely for at least another couple years, maybe longer. I also recently tasted this wine in Magnum format which yielded a slightly different tasting note (which I will share another time) and which should have another 4-5 years on it.

Covenant, Cabernet Sauvignon, 2006: Well integrated tannins meld nicely with blackberries, black cherries, raspberries, tobacco, currants and ripe plums while bold notes of oak enhance rather than overpower the ever-so-slightly spicy fruit. Hints of herbs, oriental spices, lead pencil and toasty oak on a mildly earthy mid-palate; culminate with a long, lingering finish of dark chocolate, licorice and espresso. While eminently drinkable now, ideally I’d give this another year before opening. The wine should then be at its best and will continue to cellar nicely for at least another 8-10 years (a good candidate for Zevi’s Bar-Mitzvah).

Covenant, Cabernet Sauvignon, Napa, 2008: I enjoyed a very interesting (and expensive) tasting comparison between this wine and the newly released Covenant Solomon. Both wines are made in the same way by the same folks so they are a testament to the cost of the vineyard, as the Solomon’s grapes were much more expensive. In my humble opinion – the grapes lost. While neither wine is ready to drink & both will continue to evolve over the next 8-10 years, I didn’t discern a large qualitative difference (or even a difference in the “interesting” factor or the wines’ potential longevity), especially given the near-double price for the Solomon. Don’t get me wrong – they are both great wines with subtle differences. The 2008 has plenty of blackberries, cherries, currants and black fruit on the nose, together with near-sweet cedar wood and some unexpected, but welcome, earthy minerals all of which follow through onto the rich and mouth-filling palate, backstopped by muscular tannins that are better integrated than I would have expected, but still need plenty of time to settle down, showing great promise for the continued development of this wine. Covenant’s signature extremely long lingering finish, loaded with fruit, chocolate, leather, licorice and tobacco leaf, rounds out this treat which I don’t anticipate opening again for at least 12-18 months.

RED C

Covenant, Red C, Napa Valley, 2008: This was the first vintage of the wine that I really enjoyed. A change from prior vintages, to some extent resulting from Covenant’s move into their own facilities, providing Jeff & Jonathan greater control over all aspects of the wine-making (a change less evident in the Covenant but highly noticeable in the Red C). Plenty of blackberry, currants, cherries, caramel and vanilla on the slightly earthy nose, followed by more of the same on the palate with raspberries, chocolate, anise, leather and spicy oak being added to the mix. A long and spicy finish loaded with chocolate, black fruit, more caramel and tobacco leaf rounds this wine out. Eminently drinkable now (slightly less spicy than the 2007), I’d give this one another 6 months or so before popping open, as the fruit and tannins could use a little more “getting acquainted” time before they are ready for their grand debut. A wine that will cellar nicely for at least another 5 years.

LAVAN

Covenant, Lavan, Russian River, 2008: The first vintage of Covenant’s Chardonnay and a worthy addition to Covenant’s substantial portfolio that has quickly become one of my favorite white wines. The grapes came from the Bacigalupi Vineyard (the same immediate location as Chateau Montelena’s Chardonnay) and the wine was made with the help of David Ramey (noted winemaker of Ramey Wine Cellars). This wine has a delightful nose of luscious fruits including apples, pears, figs, apricots, mangoes and crème brûlée, following for the most part onto the (ever-so) slightly sweet palate with plenty of summer fruit, citrus, more caramel and some toasty oak with a hint of welcome bitterness leading into the characteristically true delightfully long finish. A big California Chardonnay, the wine was relatively clear of oak overload, with plenty of mouth-watering acidity, and can be characterized somewhere between a typical California Chardonnay and a flinty Chablis. I found this to be an utterly delicious wine and am quite thankful that it is priced closer to the Red C than the Covenant! Drinking deliciously now, this wine should cellar comfortably for another 5 years, making it a welcome addition to the maturing kosher white wine market which also includes the Chardonnay wines from Four Gates and Yarden’s Odem Vineyard, among others. Only 280 cases were produced and the wine sold out pretty quickly.

Covenant, Lavan, Russian River, 2009: After the success of the 2008 vintage I was super-excited to try the 2009, and it did not disappoint. Sourced from a single vineyard in the Carneros section of Napa Valley, the wine was blended from two Chardonnay clones (Robert Young and Wente) and the difference in vineyards is easily distinguished even though the style remains the same – that of a powerful and sophisticated California Chardonnay that avoids being overly oaky and buttery, with hints of Burgundy. Tons of pear, apricots, peaches and figs on the nose and palate, accompanied by vanilla, oak and hints of spiciness. Slightly more mineral notes and less caramel than the 2008. A delicious and refreshing wine with plenty of acidity to keep everything honest. A long and slightly finish rounds out this very refreshing wine that will continue to cellar nicely for another five years. 350 cases were produced.

Psagot Winery

#125 – April 29, 2010

This week I wanted to talk the Psagot Winery. Founded by Yaakov Berg in 2002, after he had been growing grapes in his vineyards for a couple years prior to that, the winery is located in the Northern Jerusalem Mountains. Berg professes a deep commitment to and bond with the land and even lives in the midst of his vineyards in an ancient rail-car. I first (and last) wrote about this winery in 2006 in connection with their 2004 vintage and after tasting the wines from the 2007 vintage – referring to Psagot as an “up-and-coming” winery won’t exactly cut it. Exploding is a more accurate term to describe the increase in quality that the Psagot winery has gone through over the last couple years. Psagot’s wines scored very high in a recent blind tasted I helped judge in connection with the Jewish Week’s annual kosher wine guide. A significant part of this improvement is a result of the recent investment by a number of silent, US-based, investors who have enabled the winery to significantly increase both its capacity and quality of wines.

During the building of the winery a cave was discovered underneath the vineyards and, once excavated, turned out to contain an ancient wine press dating back to the Second Temple. Today the cave serves as a majestic barrel room where Psagot’s wines age gracefully in near perfect natural conditions (the cooling system is rarely used – temperature remains constant – between 12 C in the winter to 18 C in the summer – with humidity at 90%) and also houses the modern stainless steel tanks and other winemaking equipment making for an interesting combination of ancient and modern winemaking facilities housed under the vineyards which were arduously planted in rocky limestone.

Even though it has been a wine-growing area since ancient times, it has recently been gaining much acclaim as one of Israel’s prime wine-growing areas (alongside the more traditional Golan Heights and Northern Galilee) and was recently profiled in the Wall Street Journal with Psagot receiving a nice mention. Additionally a number of the wines from the 2007 vintage (which I have reviewed below) recently received nice scores from the Wine Advocate.

The winery produces a Bordeaux blend named Edom which is its flagship wine and regular varietal wines in the Psagot series. For the 2007 vintage, the winery also produced a single-vineyard Cabernet Sauvignon which is excellent. Psagot also produces a Port-style wine called “Prat” although I find this wine to be the least impressive of their offerings. The varietals include Cabernet Sauvignon, Merlot, Cabernet Franc, Viognier and Chardonnay but skipped some vintages in which they did not produce the Chardonnay and Viognier. While they own a significant amount of the sourcing vineyards, they also rely on grapes from the local Dolev and Har-Bracha vineyards. Production from the 2008 (Shmittah) vintage was of about 80,000 bottles and the 2009 vintage is anticipated to be around 90,000 bottles.

Psagot, Cabernet Sauvignon, Single Vineyard, 2007: Easily the best wine to date from this winery. A full bodied wine that still needs some time for the wood and tannins to settle down and play nicely with the fruit but the good balance bodes well for this wines delightful future. I would give it another 6-8 months in the bottle before opening but if opened now, it can still very much be enjoyed with some swirling and waiting ten minutes or so between pouring and drinking. Rich and juicy black forest fruits on both the nose and palate mingle with a slight bitterness and hints of espresso. The wine recently scored an 88 from Parker’s Wine Advocate but deserved a much higher score. I find that the Wine Advocate tends to underscore Israeli wines which could be a result of their unfamiliarity with (or personal dislike of) the green notes that are part of Israel’s terrior and which I feel provides Israeli wines with a delicious individuality.

Psagot, Cabernet Franc, 2007: How could I not love a winery with a nice Cabernet Franc on its resume? This one has a heady nose of spicy oak, asphalt, lead pencil and herbaceousness that reaches out and grabs your attention right away. A full-bodied wine with good structure with blackberries and currants matched with the oak. A lingering finish rounds out this delight which recently scored an 86 from the Wine Advocate but deserved much more.

Psagot, Merlot, 2007: A fruity and delicious Merlot with loads of red currants, blackberries and raspberries on a gentle background of spicy and sweet wood (try it – you will see). A sturdy but gentle wine that provides for a mouth-filling delight. At its prime now, the wine will cellar nicely for another 2-3 years or so but isn’t meant for any long-term cellaring.

Psagot, Edom 2007: A wine that has steadfastly improved both in quality and sophistication every year it has been produced. A delicious Bordeaux blend of Cabernet Sauvignon, Merlot, Cabernet Franc and Petit Verdot (59%, 19%, 12% and 10% respectively). Another robust and full bodied wine from Psagot, the spiciness from the word is well integrated with the blackberries, currants, juicy plums and gooseberries leading to a finish redolent with green herbs. Round and mouth-filling – this wine is a treat and scored an 87 from the Wine Advocate in their recent tasting of Israeli wines.

Psagot, Cabernet Sauvignon, 2007: At least in Israel, this wine is a YH Best Buy giving us an incredibly rich and layered wine at a very good price (about $15 in Israel). While the wine also includes grapes grown in the Northern Galilee, most of the grapes were sourced from vineyards located in the Judean Hills, which tends to provide wines with a lot of fruit accompanied by stony minerals. The wine was aged for 13 months in French oak which gives it pleasant flavors of wood and vanilla. These flavors blend nicely with the blackberries and plums together with some dark espresso and mint. With soft, silky and slightly sweet tannins, this wine is a pleasure to drink and will cellar nicely for another couple of years. With the prices of the Recanati and Galil Mountain wines edging up, this present a nice alternative that, while ever-so-slightly more expensive, is also a more sophisticated wine.